<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This and That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theobamadiary.com/2013/02/13/this-and-that-56/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theobamadiary.com/2013/02/13/this-and-that-56/</link>
	<description>President Barack Obama ... photos, videos &#38; a word or two</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 57andfemale</title>
		<link>http://theobamadiary.com/2013/02/13/this-and-that-56/#comment-647828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[57andfemale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theobamadiary.com/?p=106793#comment-647828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I may have been wrong about that.  I was thinking of Durbin saying that they had the votes and then the Senate leadership got angry at Merkeley for leaking the names of the hesitant Dem&#039;s.  I thought I had heard that Boxer was definitely on board, but she did ultimately vote against the weakened bill.  A lot of the reporting afterwards (such as it is and we have to question the reliability) was that the leadership and the questionable Dem&#039;s were more concerned about Merkeley&#039;s &#039;betrayal&#039; than they were about filibuster reform.  

No matter what, it was down to getting one of two Senators on board for real reform if Harry Reid had actually wanted it (which he now says he never intended -- just procedural stuff but nothing that ends the abuse).  I cannot believe that Barbara Boxer or Diane Feinstein would have been the one senator to have killed filibuster reform, if Harry Reid had fought for their votes.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may have been wrong about that.  I was thinking of Durbin saying that they had the votes and then the Senate leadership got angry at Merkeley for leaking the names of the hesitant Dem&#8217;s.  I thought I had heard that Boxer was definitely on board, but she did ultimately vote against the weakened bill.  A lot of the reporting afterwards (such as it is and we have to question the reliability) was that the leadership and the questionable Dem&#8217;s were more concerned about Merkeley&#8217;s &#8216;betrayal&#8217; than they were about filibuster reform.  </p>
<p>No matter what, it was down to getting one of two Senators on board for real reform if Harry Reid had actually wanted it (which he now says he never intended &#8212; just procedural stuff but nothing that ends the abuse).  I cannot believe that Barbara Boxer or Diane Feinstein would have been the one senator to have killed filibuster reform, if Harry Reid had fought for their votes.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 57andfemale</title>
		<link>http://theobamadiary.com/2013/02/13/this-and-that-56/#comment-647827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[57andfemale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theobamadiary.com/?p=106793#comment-647827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I admit my mistake.  They did vote against even the watered-down version.  But I cannot believe that if Harry Reid had wanted their votes he couldn&#039;t have gotten them, particularly Boxer.  Certainly leading up to the vote, Durbin flat out said that they had the votes for the stronger Merkeley version.  

Harry Reid (and others) were very annoyed that Merkeley leaked the names of the hesitant Dem&#039;s.  Harry was out to punish Merkeley for that instead of really reforming the filibuster.  It is now obvious, however, that Harry never intended on the filibuster reform that he led us to believe was in the works. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit my mistake.  They did vote against even the watered-down version.  But I cannot believe that if Harry Reid had wanted their votes he couldn&#8217;t have gotten them, particularly Boxer.  Certainly leading up to the vote, Durbin flat out said that they had the votes for the stronger Merkeley version.  </p>
<p>Harry Reid (and others) were very annoyed that Merkeley leaked the names of the hesitant Dem&#8217;s.  Harry was out to punish Merkeley for that instead of really reforming the filibuster.  It is now obvious, however, that Harry never intended on the filibuster reform that he led us to believe was in the works. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathkatun7</title>
		<link>http://theobamadiary.com/2013/02/13/this-and-that-56/#comment-647808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nathkatun7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theobamadiary.com/?p=106793#comment-647808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am glad I am not alone in seeing what&#039;s going on here. This also explains to me the unprecedented obstruction currently taking place in Congress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad I am not alone in seeing what&#8217;s going on here. This also explains to me the unprecedented obstruction currently taking place in Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yardarm756</title>
		<link>http://theobamadiary.com/2013/02/13/this-and-that-56/#comment-647783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yardarm756]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 06:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theobamadiary.com/?p=106793#comment-647783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You best believe it my friend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You best believe it my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathkatun7</title>
		<link>http://theobamadiary.com/2013/02/13/this-and-that-56/#comment-647779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nathkatun7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 05:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theobamadiary.com/?p=106793#comment-647779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am absolutely convinced that some of these people want to see a violent uprising because the country made a mistake of  twice electing a non-white person that they can&#039;t control and order around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am absolutely convinced that some of these people want to see a violent uprising because the country made a mistake of  twice electing a non-white person that they can&#8217;t control and order around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
