I remember Au from chemistry class. Itās just weird to see you keep writing Au over and over again outside of a chemistry class, instead of the typical word, —-> gold.
Crikey, noooooooooo - never competed for the Europa League, thatād be like conceding, before a ball is kicked, that you are the the Glenn Greenwald of football: a loser.
/tapping gently on her shoulder/ Ahm…er…. Nerdy. psst, Nerdy! Ahem, excuse me, Ms Nerdy.
In case you missed this earlier today, Chips has promised IN WRITING to be football reasonable for the next couple of months. Ahm…er…Iād like to suggest….er, respectfully,… that you keep on your side of the fence so that the village can….ahm… er… you know…š
Let's pray! 'There'll be footballing peace btwn me & Nerdy until Aug, now that the season is over!' ~@TheObamaDiary pic.twitter.com/WemZZthoPc
Gotta love Jay stating what the team has said about SS privately and publicly. You can tell that ace reporter Ed ‘Cheshire Catā Henry combed Tim Geithnerās book looking for anything that he could use to ask an accusatory and negative question. So the best he came up with is a nothing burger on the issue of Social Security and the deficit. Pathetic.
Thank you Meta for posting, please keep tweeting this information if you can.
Some guy, canāt remember his name, was on the Stephanopolis Sunday Round Table and tried to suggest that President Obama was responsible for the coward B_______s who kidnapped the Nigerian girls; trying to say that it was due to their foreign policy failure. I could not believe my ears. Donna B. was on the show, and I felt like she should have jumped all over his a_ _ for such lies. I didnāt watch the whole thing, was just too mad to stomach this BS.
What is it that they donāt blame the President for? Donna should have been forceful, as a Democrat, and beating his a_ _ if need be. The Dems allow the repukes too much ROOM to lie; they should be in their face about Benghazi, and asking the same questions about Iraqās investigation when we lost 4,000 plus of our men and women based on a lie, AND the countless number of innocent people who died because of Bush/Cheney lying us into a war.
DEMS, PLEASE STOP BEING SO DAMN PASSIVE AND FIGHT BACK BECAUSE A LIE THAT IS LEFT UNCHALLENGED BECOMES THE TRUTH BY DEFAULT!
Happy Monday to you Don,
Yes, she was just chilling, thatās the problem; repukes lie with a straight face and yell to the top of their voices-with the lie.
Dems sit back and chill (not all) while the lies are being served up.
Besides, Donna is one of a handful of blacks that served in the Clinton administration that still sees Bill as some sort of all-knowing āDaddy,ā and that they will protect him with every fiber of their being.
I personally havenāt been impressed with her because she is all for the Clintons and will defend Hillary at the twinkle of an eye. She agreed with the statement that President Obama could have done more regarding Syria with one of panelist yesterday.
Some of the Dems are living 2016 “NOW” instead of focusing on the work that the President is accomplishing “without” the repukes, and preparing for 2014. Many of them never “get it” when they have something good.
They should be locked in arms; walking step-by-step, rolling forward to victory on the accomplishments of “this administration.” When they have the microphone, they spend time talking about what the President could have done-should have done, instead of “preaching” about what he has already done and is still doing.
I know how you feel. I stopped opening my e-mails from OFA and the others; crying sad stories as to why we need to give or supporting Hillary. I got so fed up with the sad stories and how we were going to lose.
They did that when President Obama was running for 2nd term, and I wrote them and told them to “STOP” speaking failure over his life and predicting failure, it just pissed me off; doom and gloom everywhere and that is why I needed to contribute according to the e-mail. I told them that if they didnāt believe in his victory, they should not be working on his campaign. Ironically, they (emails) stopped.
Good for you! That is not the way to run a campaign; scare tactics, fear mongering and doom is how the repukes do it, DEMS should not step in the water of this type of politics.
The passion to protect and stand up for President Obama comes from the voters, and not from other Democratic elected politicians or so called Democratic pundits.
The behavior demonstrated my Donna B is not at all surprising when it is seen through a lens that measures a personās perceived value, Malcom X talks about this type of behavior in one of his famous speeches about the house negro and the field negro.
Every sickness that Clinton felt when he was in office was internalized by Donna B and other Blacks that worked in the Clinton administration, it was also internalized by some of the Black Democratic elected politicians that were in office at that time. When Clinton was sick it was āWe Sick,ā but when Obama got sick it was āHeās sick.ā
Malcolm describes the difference between the “house Negro” and the “field Negro.”
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. 23 January 1963.
Transcribed text from audio excerpt. [read entire speech]
So you have two types of Negro. The old type and the new type. Most of you know the old type. When you read about him in history during slavery he was called “Uncle Tom.” He was the house Negro. And during slavery you had two Negroes. You had the house Negro and the field Negro.
The house Negro usually lived close to his master. He dressed like his master. He wore his masterās second-hand clothes. He ate food that his master left on the table. And he lived in his masterās house-probably in the basement or the attic-but he still lived in the masterās house.
So whenever that house Negro identified himself, he always identified himself in the same sense that his master identified himself. When his master said, “We have good food,” the house Negro would say, “Yes, we have plenty of good food.” “We” have plenty of good food. When the master said that “we have a fine home here,” the house Negro said, “Yes, we have a fine home here.” When the master would be sick, the house Negro identified himself so much with his master heād say, “Whatās the matter boss, we sick?” His masterās pain was his pain. And it hurt him more for his master to be sick than for him to be sick himself. When the house started burning down, that type of Negro would fight harder to put the masterās house out than the master himself would.
But then you had another Negro out in the field. The house Negro was in the minority. The masses-the field Negroes were the masses. They were in the majority. When the master got sick, they prayed that heād die. [Laughter] If his house caught on fire, theyād pray for a wind to come along and fan the breeze.
If someone came to the house Negro and said, “Letās go, letās separate,” naturally that Uncle Tom would say, “Go where? What could I do without boss? Where would I live? How would I dress? Who would look out for me?” Thatās the house Negro. But if you went to the field Negro and said, “Letās go, letās separate,” he wouldnāt even ask you where or how. Heād say, “Yes, letās go.” And that one ended right there.
So now you have a twentieth-century-type of house Negro. A twentieth-century Uncle Tom. Heās just as much an Uncle Tom today as Uncle Tom was 100 and 200 years ago. Only heās a modern Uncle Tom. That Uncle Tom wore a handkerchief around his head. This Uncle Tom wears a top hat. Heās sharp. He dresses just like you do. He speaks the same phraseology, the same language. He tries to speak it better than you do. He speaks with the same accents, same diction. And when you say, “your army,” he says, “our army.” He hasnāt got anybody to defend him, but anytime you say “we” he says “we.” “Our president,” “our government,” “our Senate,” “our congressmen,” “our this and our that.” And he hasnāt even got a seat in that “our” even at the end of the line. So this is the twentieth-century Negro. Whenever you say “you,” the personal pronoun in the singular or in the plural, he uses it right along with you. When you say youāre in trouble, he says, “Yes, weāre in trouble.”
But thereās another kind of Black man on the scene. If you say youāre in trouble, he says, “Yes, youāre in trouble.” [Laughter] He doesnāt identify himself with your plight whatsoever.
SOURCE: X, Malcolm. “The Race Problem.” African Students Association and NAACP Campus Chapter. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. 23 January 1963.
Now that itās May, has your husband heard any more from that colleague at the Food Bank who said he (the colleague) was off to work for Hillary 2016?
BTW, how do food banks work? Do local supermarkets donate food to a charity, who then allocates to needy residents? Just curious.
Wow - good memory about that guy! So much for that supposed May 1 announcement date - I was just thinking that the other day. All weāve heard is that the guy from the food bank went off to LA for 6 weeks to train and is now stationed in Chicago. I just saw this article about the staff, but our local guy isnāt one of the regional managers: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/ready-for-hillary-field-staff-hires
Our local food bank gets food donated from groceries (including WalMart) and also buys some produce or other needed items that arenāt donated. I assume the businesses get some sort of write-off for donating instead of throwing it away. The recipients have paperwork from somewhere proving they are residents of our town and that they have X members of their household. Iāve learned a lot since R started volunteering there.
It nauseates me that so many who worked so hard, who literally gave their sweat and tears to PBO in 2008 and 2012 have jumped ship to HRC.
I understand the need to latch on to another Dem, but why not work for a Congressman/woman in a swing district or Senator up for re-election?
Why canāt these Dem operatives see what the rest of us see?
HRC means:
-WJC rattling around in the WH
-Dynasty politics
-20th century baggage brought into the 21st century
-Cynical grassroots, not actual community organizing, etc.
I posted some AFP tweets on Uruguay on the previous thread.
Uruguay, which recently legalized marijuana (limit 10 grams a week, at $1 a gram).
The Uruguay President was not likely to be wearing a tie at todayās meeting with PBO.
Also, to answer your question from this weekend re: new Twitter profile. The number of people you recently followed/were followed by appears in the timeline on the Twitter profile (where youād expect to see a tweet).
I use no apps associated with Twitter. I used to use Tweetdeck, but have given up on that app.
The number ….. appears in the timeline on the Twitter profile (where youād expect to see a tweet).
A415, Thank you. Your explanation didnāt work for me. I still didnāt see any numbers anywhere near my profile. Iām glad no apps are involved, but I would love to know how to locate the new followers info. I am wondering if it wasnāt there because I have not updated my profile in the new format.
Sorry, I wasnāt clear. The follower info only appears in timelines of people whose profiles display in the new Twitter format.
Hereās what you see if you go to @Phil_Radfordās timeline (just scroll down a bit from his most recent tweet).
Sample follower info in timeline of new Twitter profile: pic.twitter.com/EDO9RfjCDi
— Arapaho415 (@arapaho415) May 12, 2025
So you can see he recently followed 73 people.
You can see your followers in your twitter profile - twitter.com/sonamie
Recent followers appear in “Notifications”
LL recommended unfollowers.me, which is great.
You login using your twitter account and it lets you know:
not following back
mutual follow back
fans (people who follow you that you donāt follow back)
No surprise tweets in your timeline, that say something like @sonamie followed 29 people and unfollowed 400.
Relating to CNN interview with racist pig Sterling, Jake Tapper to Anderson Cooper, “Congratulations on the get.”
Thatās all it is to these empty shells. A “get.” Nothing newsworthy; just get their own names and faces before the cameras, and then high five it after work. Really wish somebody with integrity would jump on the national media scene. Wonāt hold my breath.
THESE THAWS ARE THE RESULT OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND OUR FAILURE AS EARTHāS STEWARDS TO PROTECT WHAT GOD HAS GIVEN US…HOWEVER…THE CHANGES NOW…THE TRAUMA INDUCED BY HORRIFIC DISASTERS IS BIBLICAL. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS READ THE BOOK OF REVELATIONS…THATāS WHERE WE ARE…AND CHRIST WILL RETURN. THESE CHANGES ARE PROPHETIC INDEED…STAY TUNED FOR FUTURE ATTRACTIONS!
So very true, Sue. It seems too many people mis-read Dominion to be transited and Domination. Your definition of Earthās Stewards is true Dominion. To enrich and broaden our care, that is what it means to me. To always seek balance according to the Laws of Nature.
Late in the article, they are speaking of sea levels increasing 3-4 METERS. Hello, Americans generally are ignorant of anything metric, but this is an enormous rise.
White House.gov
Goooooooorgeous photos Nerdy, thank you!!!
Thank you.
Congratulations, Mrs. Truly and Not Cheating First.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/live/press-briefing-press-secretary-jay-carney-197
Jayās at the Podium….Live.
Congrats for your Au Lady Chips.
Good Afternoon or is it Good Evening in your neck of the woods?
What does this “Au” you keep writing mean, Nena?
Typically, “AU” means Alternate Universe.
Is Au another language?
Au is Periodic term for GOLD.
Ag Is Silver.
I have yet to remember what stands for Bronze. I refused willfully to look it up. Going by my Middle school science….memory.
I remember Au from chemistry class. Itās just weird to see you keep writing Au over and over again outside of a chemistry class, instead of the typical word, —-> gold.
Trying to keep or rather to minimize my errors.
I like anything that makes us think and wakes up my brain on a Monday!
Iād like to think it = gold, and as a Man United fan thatās the only flippinā gold Iāve seen all yearš„
Yeah, thatās true. Itās just weird to see Au instead of the word gold outside of a chemistry class.
Itās the “only flippinā gold” youāll see all year and for the next couple of seasons. Bahahahahahahahahahaha….
Manchester United fails to qualify for European competition for the first time in 25 years
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/05/manchester-united-europe-25-years
Thatās actually a complete relief, the Europa League is the Chuck Todd of footballing competitions: worthless and a complete waste of time.
Says the L-O-S-E-R team who competed fiercely for it for 25 YEARS.
Crikey, noooooooooo - never competed for the Europa League, thatād be like conceding, before a ball is kicked, that you are the the Glenn Greenwald of football: a loser.
/tapping gently on her shoulder/ Ahm…er…. Nerdy. psst, Nerdy! Ahem, excuse me, Ms Nerdy.
In case you missed this earlier today, Chips has promised IN WRITING to be football reasonable for the next couple of months. Ahm…er…Iād like to suggest….er, respectfully,… that you keep on your side of the fence so that the village can….ahm… er… you know…š
Oh, VC, you are good! Really, really good!
TY, MP. I do try to be a good girl, but donāt always succeed. š
I didnāt look……for Bronze
But here is the Periodic Table of the Elements from The GOOGLE
http://www.webelements.com/
So A Good Midnight I should have wished you?
That would have sounded like I was wishing you to go to bed……
So I will say Good Day from now on? Or Good Evening-Ishš ?
GM/A/E/N
Got it.
For with my typing skills……those letters might be bestš
Truth will out - Rs think only of self - climate change is another good example
Nice picture.
Welcome IdealisticRebel!
Tim Geithner?
Ed A*s Henry asking about TimGās Book?
Love the answer by Jay…..detailing the economic situation and what the Team had to do to save the nation.
SS didnāt not contribute to the deficit. Jay is schooling the A*s.
SS Not the driver or main driver, the Obama Team said so privately and publicly.
Gotta love Jay stating what the team has said about SS privately and publicly. You can tell that ace reporter Ed ‘Cheshire Catā Henry combed Tim Geithnerās book looking for anything that he could use to ask an accusatory and negative question. So the best he came up with is a nothing burger on the issue of Social Security and the deficit. Pathetic.
For all the RW punks out there who donāt think the U.S. is doing anything:
Thank you Meta for posting, please keep tweeting this information if you can.
Some guy, canāt remember his name, was on the Stephanopolis Sunday Round Table and tried to suggest that President Obama was responsible for the coward B_______s who kidnapped the Nigerian girls; trying to say that it was due to their foreign policy failure. I could not believe my ears. Donna B. was on the show, and I felt like she should have jumped all over his a_ _ for such lies. I didnāt watch the whole thing, was just too mad to stomach this BS.
What is it that they donāt blame the President for? Donna should have been forceful, as a Democrat, and beating his a_ _ if need be. The Dems allow the repukes too much ROOM to lie; they should be in their face about Benghazi, and asking the same questions about Iraqās investigation when we lost 4,000 plus of our men and women based on a lie, AND the countless number of innocent people who died because of Bush/Cheney lying us into a war.
DEMS, PLEASE STOP BEING SO DAMN PASSIVE AND FIGHT BACK BECAUSE A LIE THAT IS LEFT UNCHALLENGED BECOMES THE TRUTH BY DEFAULT!
Donna B was probably too busy smiling and laughing and calling everybody her “Boo” to notice such a crass accusation.
Happy Monday to you Don,
Yes, she was just chilling, thatās the problem; repukes lie with a straight face and yell to the top of their voices-with the lie.
Dems sit back and chill (not all) while the lies are being served up.
Besides, Donna is one of a handful of blacks that served in the Clinton administration that still sees Bill as some sort of all-knowing āDaddy,ā and that they will protect him with every fiber of their being.
I personally havenāt been impressed with her because she is all for the Clintons and will defend Hillary at the twinkle of an eye. She agreed with the statement that President Obama could have done more regarding Syria with one of panelist yesterday.
Some of the Dems are living 2016 “NOW” instead of focusing on the work that the President is accomplishing “without” the repukes, and preparing for 2014. Many of them never “get it” when they have something good.
They should be locked in arms; walking step-by-step, rolling forward to victory on the accomplishments of “this administration.” When they have the microphone, they spend time talking about what the President could have done-should have done, instead of “preaching” about what he has already done and is still doing.
I just donāt get it.
OH GAWD, donāt get me started. Iām still fuming from an OFA invitation I got over the weekend to attend a “Ready for Hillary” event. I went nuts.
Meta,
I know how you feel. I stopped opening my e-mails from OFA and the others; crying sad stories as to why we need to give or supporting Hillary. I got so fed up with the sad stories and how we were going to lose.
They did that when President Obama was running for 2nd term, and I wrote them and told them to “STOP” speaking failure over his life and predicting failure, it just pissed me off; doom and gloom everywhere and that is why I needed to contribute according to the e-mail. I told them that if they didnāt believe in his victory, they should not be working on his campaign. Ironically, they (emails) stopped.
Cindy & Meta,
Last week I unsubscribed from one of those D committee (canāt remember which). When I hit unsubscribe, it asked me “why?”.
I said when you start showing support for PBO and stop all the gloom & doom I might reconsider.
Happy Monday GGail!
Good for you! That is not the way to run a campaign; scare tactics, fear mongering and doom is how the repukes do it, DEMS should not step in the water of this type of politics.
Happy Monday to you too Cindy!
The passion to protect and stand up for President Obama comes from the voters, and not from other Democratic elected politicians or so called Democratic pundits.
The behavior demonstrated my Donna B is not at all surprising when it is seen through a lens that measures a personās perceived value, Malcom X talks about this type of behavior in one of his famous speeches about the house negro and the field negro.
Yes, Yes!
Every sickness that Clinton felt when he was in office was internalized by Donna B and other Blacks that worked in the Clinton administration, it was also internalized by some of the Black Democratic elected politicians that were in office at that time. When Clinton was sick it was āWe Sick,ā but when Obama got sick it was āHeās sick.ā
Malcolm describes the difference between the “house Negro” and the “field Negro.”
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. 23 January 1963.
Transcribed text from audio excerpt. [read entire speech]
So you have two types of Negro. The old type and the new type. Most of you know the old type. When you read about him in history during slavery he was called “Uncle Tom.” He was the house Negro. And during slavery you had two Negroes. You had the house Negro and the field Negro.
The house Negro usually lived close to his master. He dressed like his master. He wore his masterās second-hand clothes. He ate food that his master left on the table. And he lived in his masterās house-probably in the basement or the attic-but he still lived in the masterās house.
So whenever that house Negro identified himself, he always identified himself in the same sense that his master identified himself. When his master said, “We have good food,” the house Negro would say, “Yes, we have plenty of good food.” “We” have plenty of good food. When the master said that “we have a fine home here,” the house Negro said, “Yes, we have a fine home here.” When the master would be sick, the house Negro identified himself so much with his master heād say, “Whatās the matter boss, we sick?” His masterās pain was his pain. And it hurt him more for his master to be sick than for him to be sick himself. When the house started burning down, that type of Negro would fight harder to put the masterās house out than the master himself would.
But then you had another Negro out in the field. The house Negro was in the minority. The masses-the field Negroes were the masses. They were in the majority. When the master got sick, they prayed that heād die. [Laughter] If his house caught on fire, theyād pray for a wind to come along and fan the breeze.
If someone came to the house Negro and said, “Letās go, letās separate,” naturally that Uncle Tom would say, “Go where? What could I do without boss? Where would I live? How would I dress? Who would look out for me?” Thatās the house Negro. But if you went to the field Negro and said, “Letās go, letās separate,” he wouldnāt even ask you where or how. Heād say, “Yes, letās go.” And that one ended right there.
So now you have a twentieth-century-type of house Negro. A twentieth-century Uncle Tom. Heās just as much an Uncle Tom today as Uncle Tom was 100 and 200 years ago. Only heās a modern Uncle Tom. That Uncle Tom wore a handkerchief around his head. This Uncle Tom wears a top hat. Heās sharp. He dresses just like you do. He speaks the same phraseology, the same language. He tries to speak it better than you do. He speaks with the same accents, same diction. And when you say, “your army,” he says, “our army.” He hasnāt got anybody to defend him, but anytime you say “we” he says “we.” “Our president,” “our government,” “our Senate,” “our congressmen,” “our this and our that.” And he hasnāt even got a seat in that “our” even at the end of the line. So this is the twentieth-century Negro. Whenever you say “you,” the personal pronoun in the singular or in the plural, he uses it right along with you. When you say youāre in trouble, he says, “Yes, weāre in trouble.”
But thereās another kind of Black man on the scene. If you say youāre in trouble, he says, “Yes, youāre in trouble.” [Laughter] He doesnāt identify himself with your plight whatsoever.
SOURCE: X, Malcolm. “The Race Problem.” African Students Association and NAACP Campus Chapter. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. 23 January 1963.
Checkmate!
A Whole Lot of Love…..
The POTUS and FLOTUS Style.
I agree with you today, Ms Wonka.
I agree with you today, Ms Wonka.
That repeat was not supposed to be there. This was. Apologies.
Couldnāt agree more!
Just came across these ideas for “Benghazi, the Musical” and now I canāt get those tunes outta my brain. And so Iām passing it on.
I think it might be a smash hit. Or something.
Hi, muscatinegal,
Now that itās May, has your husband heard any more from that colleague at the Food Bank who said he (the colleague) was off to work for Hillary 2016?
BTW, how do food banks work? Do local supermarkets donate food to a charity, who then allocates to needy residents? Just curious.
Wow - good memory about that guy! So much for that supposed May 1 announcement date - I was just thinking that the other day. All weāve heard is that the guy from the food bank went off to LA for 6 weeks to train and is now stationed in Chicago. I just saw this article about the staff, but our local guy isnāt one of the regional managers: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/ready-for-hillary-field-staff-hires
Our local food bank gets food donated from groceries (including WalMart) and also buys some produce or other needed items that arenāt donated. I assume the businesses get some sort of write-off for donating instead of throwing it away. The recipients have paperwork from somewhere proving they are residents of our town and that they have X members of their household. Iāve learned a lot since R started volunteering there.
It nauseates me that so many who worked so hard, who literally gave their sweat and tears to PBO in 2008 and 2012 have jumped ship to HRC.
I understand the need to latch on to another Dem, but why not work for a Congressman/woman in a swing district or Senator up for re-election?
Why canāt these Dem operatives see what the rest of us see?
HRC means:
-WJC rattling around in the WH
-Dynasty politics
-20th century baggage brought into the 21st century
-Cynical grassroots, not actual community organizing, etc.
This has me rotflmao!! This is just superb! Yet, sad because itās so true.
Sorry, in 2014, “first ever” always makes me sad, not glad. #Forward
VC,
I posted some AFP tweets on Uruguay on the previous thread.
Uruguay, which recently legalized marijuana (limit 10 grams a week, at $1 a gram).
The Uruguay President was not likely to be wearing a tie at todayās meeting with PBO.
Also, to answer your question from this weekend re: new Twitter profile. The number of people you recently followed/were followed by appears in the timeline on the Twitter profile (where youād expect to see a tweet).
I use no apps associated with Twitter. I used to use Tweetdeck, but have given up on that app.
The number ….. appears in the timeline on the Twitter profile (where youād expect to see a tweet).
A415, Thank you. Your explanation didnāt work for me. I still didnāt see any numbers anywhere near my profile. Iām glad no apps are involved, but I would love to know how to locate the new followers info. I am wondering if it wasnāt there because I have not updated my profile in the new format.
Sorry, I wasnāt clear. The follower info only appears in timelines of people whose profiles display in the new Twitter format.
Hereās what you see if you go to @Phil_Radfordās timeline (just scroll down a bit from his most recent tweet).
So you can see he recently followed 73 people.
You can see your followers in your twitter profile - twitter.com/sonamie
Recent followers appear in “Notifications”
LL recommended unfollowers.me, which is great.
You login using your twitter account and it lets you know:
not following back
mutual follow back
fans (people who follow you that you donāt follow back)
No surprise tweets in your timeline, that say something like @sonamie followed 29 people and unfollowed 400.
This is clearer, thank you very much, A415. Appreciate your time and patience.
The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice… slowly…
This, from January… I havenāt kept track of this case, but it seems significant, and needless to say, long overdue.
Tips (for Americans) if you are planning to go to Brazil for the World Cup
Hi Bobfr: Saw these and decided to deliver them for you. š
Whatever Championās League……
Here is the IMPORTANT INFO:
Hey Chiparooo……you and I are normal. We both saw chicken first too.
Anyone who says they saw puppies first is a damn liar.
Will not lie. I, too, saw fried chicken.
Yes, thatās what I saw.
Sorry for double. Didnāt think first one posted.
I see cute puppies that are the color of golden fried chicken, but I clearly see that they are dogs.š
(now Iām hungry for some Popeyeās Chicken!)
Me want one of those cute puppies.
I saw ‘puppyā first, but did note that they were the color of fried chicken.
Me too 57
And now, guess what Iām gonna have for dinner tonight - fried chicken
Chicken
Relating to CNN interview with racist pig Sterling, Jake Tapper to Anderson Cooper, “Congratulations on the get.”
Thatās all it is to these empty shells. A “get.” Nothing newsworthy; just get their own names and faces before the cameras, and then high five it after work. Really wish somebody with integrity would jump on the national media scene. Wonāt hold my breath.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/lady-praises-mom-mothers-day-event-23683855
This wonāt post, but Iām trying again because it is too cute
http://web.mail.comcast.net/service/home/~/?id=775480&part=2&auth=co&disp=i
WHO KNEW??
Budget deficit on track for six-year low
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/budget-deficit-track-six-year-low#break
Wow—-
Isnāt this bizarre?
Clay Aiken wrote the most gentlemanly, heartfelt statement. Iāll try and find the tweet.
OMG.
I was wondering whether that race was still too-close-to call.
Clay Aiken seems like a genuinely caring person.
He must be shocked beyond belief; and cue RWNJ conspiracy theorists.
Wow.
Monday, May 12th 2014……….DOW JONES CLOSES @ 16,695.47 ALL TIME HIGH.
A PITY THAT THE DEMS DONāT HAVE ANYTHING TO RUN ON…..
AHHHHH………let me not forget; 8 MILLION LIVES PLUS HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE.
Making money and saving lives but they canāt canāt find anything positive. WOW!
Some Dems agree with the repukes that President Obama could have done more regarding Syria. This is for you Donna Brazile.
Rubio is a dumb nut
THESE THAWS ARE THE RESULT OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND OUR FAILURE AS EARTHāS STEWARDS TO PROTECT WHAT GOD HAS GIVEN US…HOWEVER…THE CHANGES NOW…THE TRAUMA INDUCED BY HORRIFIC DISASTERS IS BIBLICAL. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS READ THE BOOK OF REVELATIONS…THATāS WHERE WE ARE…AND CHRIST WILL RETURN. THESE CHANGES ARE PROPHETIC INDEED…STAY TUNED FOR FUTURE ATTRACTIONS!
TRUTH!
So very true, Sue. It seems too many people mis-read Dominion to be transited and Domination. Your definition of Earthās Stewards is true Dominion. To enrich and broaden our care, that is what it means to me. To always seek balance according to the Laws of Nature.
Late in the article, they are speaking of sea levels increasing 3-4 METERS. Hello, Americans generally are ignorant of anything metric, but this is an enormous rise.
New post.
https://theobamadiary.com/2014/05/12/president-obama-honors-2014-top-cops/
awesome.
Yes in deed. I had the happy then struggled for the Motherās part. I dot the day and then quickly shouted Happy Motherās Day…..in jubilation.
Gorgeous!! I love this!!